基于元分析的Altmetrics指标与传统引用指标相关性研究  

Relevance Research on the Altmetrics Indicator and Traditional Citation Indicator Based on Meta-Analysis

作　　者：曹丽江[1] 周毅[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学社会学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《情报理论与实践》2016年第8期49-53,共5页Information Studies:Theory & Application

摘　　要：[目的/意义]Altmetrics指标与传统引用指标相关度问题是Altmetrics研究领域内热点问题。文章运用元分析的方法对Altmetrics指标与传统引用指标相关系数进行合并效应值。[方法/过程]选取国内外关于F1000指标、CiteUlike指标、Mendeley指标与传统计量学被引量指标相关性的实证研究中的独立样本数据,利用stata软件对指标间的相关系数进行统计分析。[结果/结论]经计算,F1000指标、CiteUlike指标、Mendeley指标与传统计量学被引量指标相关系数r分别为0.275,0.290,0.525。说明Altmetrics指标与传统引用指标存在显著的正相关,从实证量化的角度揭示了Altmetrics指标与传统引用指标的关系,为Altmetrics指标的研究提供了事实依据。[ Purpose/significance ] Relevance issue of Ahmetrics indicator and citation indicator is an emerging frontier do-main of Ahmetrics. This paper uses meta-analysis to integrate results from piles of Altmetrics indicator and citation indicator.[ Method/process ] The paper selects the independent data of the empirical study of the relevance of FIO00 index, CiteUlike index,Mendeley index and citation indicator of traditional Altmetrics, and calculates the correlation coefficient by using stata. [ Result/conclusion ] As the results of the meta-analysis show, the correlation coefficient with traditional citation for FIO00 index is O. 275,for CiteUlike index is O. 290, for Mendeley index is O. 525. The paper indicates that there is a significant positive correlation of Ah-metrics indicator and traditional citation indicator, reveals the relationship between Ahmetrics indicator and traditional citation indi-cator from the perspective of empirical quantification, and provides factual basis for the study of Altmetrics indicator.

关 键 词：Altmetrics指标 引用指标 元分析 相关性研究 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]