行政宪政主义视阈下我国转基因食品标识制度发展与完善  

The Development and Improvement of the Labeling System of GMF in China from the Perspective of Administrative Constitutionalism

作　　者：王虎[1,2] 卢东洋 

机构地区：[1]华中农业大学文法学院,武汉430070 [2]华中科技大学公共管理学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2016年第8期73-77,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：2016年农业部课题"农业转基因生物安全管理实证研究"(基金编号:2130109;项目代码:125001000000153020);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(项目批准号:2013QC033)阶段性成果

摘　　要：风险社会的来临极大挑战了行政决策的合法性与权威性,进而引发了有关科学与民主的行政宪政主义争论。美国偏向在科学理念的"理性-工具范式"指导下实行转基因食品自愿标识,而欧盟则偏向在更体现民主精神的"商谈-建构范式"指引下确立转基因食品强制标识。我国目前所采取的转基因食品过程中心主义强制标识制度,主要体现行政宪政主义"商谈-建构范式"特质。该范式在现行制度贯彻中还存在诸多问题,应予在范式合作理念的指导下发展与完善。The advent of risk society greatly challenged the legitimacy and authority of the decision about traditional risk regulation,and further sparked debates of administrative constitutionalism about science and democracy. The USA tends to establish voluntary labeling of GMF under the guidance of the rational- instrumental paradigm,which emphasizes the scientific concept,while the EU tends to establish mandatory labeling under the guidance of the deliberative- constitutional paradigm,which embodies the spirit of democracy. At present,the mandatory labeling system in the field of GMF labeling in our country mainly embodies the characteristics of the deliberative- constitutional paradigm. However,there are still many problems in the implementation of the paradigm,and it needs to be developed and improved under the guidance of the concept of paradigm cooperation.

关 键 词：转基因食品标识 行政宪政主义 理性-工具 商谈-建构 产品中心主义强制标识 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]