检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第4期76-80,共5页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:我国刑法采取传统性别模式评价性侵犯罪,在应对新型性侵犯罪方面存在一定的滞后性。通过对刑法法意和性权益保护方式的分析,发现由于受制于单一性别模式,强奸罪立法规定存在不足,具体体现在法益保护、犯罪行为方式、犯罪主体对象划定、涉性犯罪的概念位阶等的规定不周延,以及罪名体系不统一方面。强奸罪的立法完善应从三个方面进行:取消强奸罪的性别限制;扩大强奸罪行为方式;强调对不同性别人群的性权利予以同等保护,从而实现对不同类型性侵犯罪行为的有效规制。With the traditional gender model, China~ criminal law has lagging defects in dealing with the new type of sexual assault. Through the analysis of the legal meaning and the way of sexual rights protection, it was found out that due to limits of single gender mode, the rape crime legislation has a few defects in the following aspects, such as the profit protection, criminal behavior, delimitation of criminal subject, the forcible rape crime's concept on logic level, and the unity of the criminal system. Therefore ,the perfection of rape crime legislation should be conducted from three perspectives:eliminating the gender restriction of rape;expanding the range of rape behaviors ; emphasizing the equal protection for the sexual rights of different gender groups. In this way, we can realize the effective regulations for different types of sexual assault crime behaviors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44