检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吉雅玲[1] 丁涟沭[1] 惠晓波[1] 孙春霞[1] 王爱凤[1]
出 处:《浙江临床医学》2016年第9期1736-1738,共3页Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
基 金:江苏省医学重点人才基金(RC2007029)
摘 要:目的探讨约束护理质量考核评分标准在神经外科颅脑损伤躁动患者管理中的应用效果。方法2015年3至9月将约束护理质量考核评分标准应用于颅脑损伤躁动患者管理,并与2014年同期躁动患者的约束护理质量质控分值及护士、患者满意度进行比较。结果将约束护理质量考核评分标准应用于颅脑损伤躁动患者管理后,观察组质控总平均(94.67±1.36)分,高于对照组(89.07±3.40)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈O.05);观察组护士及患者满意度分别为97.37%、97.62%,高于对照组76.32%,78.57%,差异有统计学意义(P〈O.05)。结论将约束患者护理质量考核评分标准应用于神经外科躁动患者管理,可有效改善颅脑损伤躁动患者的约束护理质量,降低意外事件的发生,保障患者安全,提高护患满意度。Objective To investigate the application effect of constraints care quality assessment standards in neurosurgery restless brain injury patients. Method Constraints care quality assessment standards is applied to the neurosurgery restless brain injury patients in March to September 2015, and compared with constraints care quality control ( QC ) score in restless patients and satisfaction of nurses and patients. Results After constraints care quality assessment standards used in neurosurgery restless brain injury patients management, QC observation group total average ( 94.67 ± 1.36 ) points was higher than that ( 89.07 ± 3.40 ) points, the difference was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) ; Observation team of nurses and patient satisfaction were 97.37%, 97.62%, higher than that of control group ( 76.32%, 78.57% ) , the difference was statistically significant ( P〈0.05 ) . Conclusion Constraints care quality assessment standards used in neurosurgery restless brain injury patients management, can effectively improve brain injury restlessness constraint quality of patient, reducing the occurrence of accidents, protecting patient safety, Improve the nurse-patient satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.157.68