检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨玉玲[1] 木冬妹[1] 李平[1] 朱华美[1] 李婵祺[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医科大学附属第二医院神经外科,浙江温州325027
出 处:《中华全科医学》2016年第10期1766-1768,共3页Chinese Journal of General Practice
基 金:浙江省温州市科技局科技计划项目(Y20130261)
摘 要:目的探讨水胶体透明敷料护理锁骨下静脉置管(subclavian vein catheterization,SVC)的效果、费用和工作量。方法以160例符合条件的锁骨下静脉置管的患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组和实验组,2组分别应用3MHP Tegaderm^TM敷料、水胶体透明敷料固定导管。观察置管并发症、换药总费用和换药工作量。连续变量之间的比较采用t检验,分类变最之间的比较采用χ^2检验。结果实验组感染[6.8%(5/74)vs.17.7%(14/79),χ^2=4.224,P=0.040]、皮肤过敏[1.4%(1/74)VS.8.9%(7/79),χ^2=4.248,P=0.037]、脱管[2.7%(2/74)vs.11.4%(9/79),χ^2=4.231,P=0.040]和非计划件拔管[5.4%(4/74)vs.15,2%(12/79),χ^2=3.906,P=0.048]发生率均显著低于对照组。与对照组相比,实验组平均换药间隔时间较长[(5.9±1.1)d vs.(4.8±1.0)d,t=2.217.P=0.0251,换药工作量较低[(41.4±7.0)min vs.(50.6±9.8)min,t=2.078,P=0.039],单次换药时间[(13.8±2.3)min vs.(13.5±2.5)min,t=0.223,P=0.894]、换药总费用[(140.4±40.2)元vs.(143.6±37.6)元,t=0.257,P=0.851]差异无统计学意义。结论水胶体透明敷料能够更好地维护经锁骨下静脉置管,减少护理工作量,不增加费用,值得在神经外科护理工作中推广应用。Objective To explore the effect,costs and workload of using transparent hydrocolloid dressing for fixation of subclavian central venons(SVC) catheters. Methods Total 160patients undergoing SVC were included and were randomly divided into control group and test group. 3M HP Tegaderm^TM dressing in the control group and transparent hydrocolloid dressing in the test group were used for the fixation of catheters. The catheter-related complications, total medical cost and workload of dressing were observed. The Student t-test was used to compare continuous variables,χ^2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Results There were significant difference between the teat group and control group in the incidence of infections [ 6.8% (5/74) vs. 17.7% ( 14/79 ), χ^2 = 4. 224, P = 0. 040 ], skin allergies [ 1.4% ( 1/74 ) vs. 8.9% (7/79) ,χ^2 =4.248,P =0.0373 ,accidental extubation[2.7% (2/74) vs. 11.4% (9/79) ,χ^2=4. 231 ] and unplanned extubation [ 5.4% (4/74) vs. 15.2% ( 12/79 ), χ^2 = 3. 906, P = 0. 048 ]. When compared with the control group,the test group had a longer average dressing time interval [ (5.9 ± 1. 1 ) d vs. (4.8 ± 1.0) d, t = 2. 217, P = 0. 025 3, a lower dressing workload [ (41.4 ± 7.0 ) rain vs. (50.6 ± 9.8 ) min, t = 2. 078, P = 0. 039 ] ; The single dressing time [ ( 13.8 ± 2.3 ) rain vs. ( 13.5 ± 2.5 ) min, t = 0. 223, P = 0. 894 ] and the total cost of dressing[ ( 140.4 ± 40.2) Yuan vs. ( 143.6± 37.6)Yuan, t = 0. 257, P = 0. 851 ] were no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Transparent hydrocolloid dressings can better maintain SCV and rednce nursing workload without additional cost, which is worth promoting applications in neurosurgical nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145