检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘红霞[1]
出 处:《光明中医》2016年第15期2271-2273,共3页GUANGMING JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
摘 要:目的探讨护理干预在中药熏洗治疗小儿过敏性紫癜中的临床效果。方法选取我院2013年1月—2015年6月收治的146例小儿过敏性紫癜患者,按护理方法分为两组,各73例。两组均予三草汤熏洗治疗和常规护理,观察组在此基础上采取护理干预措施。比较两组护理效果。结果两组总有效率分别为94.52%、89.04%,观察组略高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患儿临床症状消失时间与家属护理满意度分别为(4.56±1.13)d、(95.26±3.87)分,均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论中药熏洗配合有效的护理干预可缩短过敏性紫癜患儿临床症状消退时间,提高疗效,促进患儿康复,家属满意度高,值得推广应用。Objective To explore the clinical effect of nursing intervention on Chinese herb fumigation and washing in the treatment of pediatric allergic purpura. Methods From January 2013 to June 2015,146 cases of children with allergic purpura were divided into two groups according to the nursing method,73 cases in each group. The two groups were treated with three herb decoction and routine nursing,and the observation group was given additionally nursing intervention. The nursing effect of the two groups was compared. Results The total effective rate of the two groups was 94. 52% and 89. 04%,respectively,while the total effective rate of the observation group was slightly higher than that of the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant( P〈0. 05). In the observation group,the clinical symptoms disappeared time and family nursing satisfaction were( 4. 56 ± 1. 13) d and( 95. 26 ± 3. 87),respectively,which was better than that of the control group,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 01). Conclusion The effective nursing intervention can shorten the time of clinical symptoms of patients with allergic purpura,improve the curative effect,promote the rehabilitation of patients,family satisfaction,and it is worthy of popularization and application.
分 类 号:R248.4[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15