检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津交通职业学院,天津300110 [2]天津大学仁爱学院,天津301636 [3]中国矿业大学(北京),北京100083
出 处:《路基工程》2016年第4期201-205,共5页Subgrade Engineering
摘 要:基于FLAC3D软件,对北京某深基坑土钉墙与桩锚组合支护结构进行数值模拟分析,并与实测值进行对比。研究结果表明:上部土钉墙支护结构,最后一排土钉最大拉力位置在中后部,不同于单一的土钉墙支护最后一排土钉的受力情况,在设计时应适当加长最后一排土钉的长度;锚索对桩顶位移的限制作用比较明显,锚索的受力值小于设计值,在设计时可以考虑适当减小锚索的长度。Based on FLAC3D software, the numerical simulation analysis was done for deep foundation pit soil nailing wall and piled anchor combined supporting structure in Beijing and the value was compared with actually measured value. The research results showed that the upper soil nailing wall supporting structure, the maximum tension of last row soil nailing is at the middle rear part. Different from the stress of single soil nailing wall supporting the last row soil nail, the last row soil nail can be lengthened appropriately. The anchor cable can obviously restrict the pile top displacement. The stress of anchor cable is smaller than the design value. In the design, the anchor cable can be shortened appropriately.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.14.133