犯罪本质视角下贪污罪和受贿罪犯罪客体要件的新解读  

On the Object Elements of Corruption and Briberyfrom the Perspective of the Essence of Crime

作　　者：牛忠志[1] 曾肖斐 

机构地区：[1]山东科技大学文法学院,山东青岛266590

出　　处：《辽宁大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第4期103-110,共8页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2015年教育部人文社会科学研究项目"犯罪本质的法益说修正及其实证研究"(15YJA820020)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：按照犯罪构成"四要件"理论,犯罪客体是成立犯罪的第一要件,它对于实质地解释具体个罪的犯罪构成、确定犯罪的分则体系归属等都有十分重要的作用。然而,刑法理论对于贪污罪和受贿罪客体要件的认识分歧巨大,这在我国反腐形势仍然严峻的背景下正确适用法律显然是十分不利。理论观点分歧的根源在于对犯罪本质认识的差异,法益说在贪污罪和受贿罪犯罪客体的立法和解释上都没有得到贯彻。犯罪本质应该是重大、正当义务的违反,贪污罪、受贿罪的犯罪本质就是对相应的重大、正当义务的违反。《刑法修正案(九)》对贪污罪定罪量刑标准的修改支持了文章的立场。According to the ＂four elements＂theory of crime, the object of the crime is the first element, which plays an important role in explaining the specific essence of a crime and determining the specific classification of a certain crime. But, a variety of views on the crime of corruption and acceptance of bribes are fiercely conflicted with each other, so it is obviously very unfavorable for the correct application of the law in the context of China＇s anti-corruption situation. The causes of different viewpoints lie in the differences in the understanding of the nature of crime. The doctrine of legal interests has not been carried out in the legislation and interpretation of the object of the crime of corruption and the crime of taking bribes. The nature of the crime should be a violation of the important and due obligations, and the nature of embezzlement and bribery is such a violation. The revision of the conviction and sentencing standards in Criminal Law Amendment（IX）supports the point of view.

关 键 词：贪污罪 受贿罪 犯罪客体要件 犯罪本质 法益说 义务违反说 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]