检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明理工大学管理与经济学院,云南昆明650093
出 处:《中国管理科学》2016年第7期72-81,共10页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71462023;71362025);云南省应用基础研究计划面上项目(2016FB114);昆明理工大学人才培养基金资助项目(KKSY201408067)
摘 要:在销售商风险规避下,运用CVaR方法研究了供应商在直营渠道(集中式供应链)和非直营渠道(分散式供应链)下回购契约的设计问题。刻画了集中式供应链下回购契约完成渠道协调的充要条件,求解了分散式供应链的最优回购契约。比较分析了集中式和分散式供应链下回购契约的差异,得到以下结论:相对于集中式供应链,供应商在分散式供应链中趋向于设定更高的批发价格,或更低的回购价格。讨论了销售商的风险规避度对契约设计和供应商收益的影响,研究表明:销售商越规避风险,供应商的收益越低。最后提供一个案例讨论了模型在现实中的应用。In a supply chain led by a supplier,the supplier always can employ contract mechanisms to coordinate the supply chain(SC)so as to improve efficiency of the channel.In many cases,the supplier can make use of different kinds of distribution channels,such as direct channels and indirect channels,hereafter refered to as centralized SC and decentralized SC respectively,to deliver commordities to the terminal market.Does there exist differences in contract arrangement in the two channels?The issue on coordination of the SC is investgated via buy-back contracts,where the supplier has a direct channel and an indirect channel,both with a risk-averse retailer.A model including two stages of game is constructed,where the aversion of the retailers are measured by the conditionally risk-at-value(CVaR),and the supplier maximizes expected profits of the entire SC and its own,respectively,in the centralized SC and the decentralized SC.The model is solved out by backwards solving techniques.Necessary and sufficient conditions are characterized to coordinate the channel via buy-back contracts in the centralized SC.The optimal buy-back contracts are solved out in the decentralized SC.Furthermore,a comparative analysis is presented on the buy-back contracts between the two channels.It shows that the supplier tends to set a higher wholesale price or a lower buyback price in the decentralized SC than that in the centralized SC,which leads to that the retailer orders less than the optimal order quantity for the sake of the entire SC.Furthermore,a sensitivity analysis is made on the impact of the retailers' risk aversion on parameters of buy-back contracts,the retailer's ordering decision and the supplier's payoffs.It shows that the supplier always tends to set a lower wholesale price,given the buy-back price,and attains a smaller expected profit,whether in the centralized SC or in the decentralized one,if the retailer becomes more risk-averse.Therefore,the supplier is more willing to cooperate with retailers with a low
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43