中国省域市场一体化影响因素研究——基于3D框架视角  

Research on Influencing Factors for Provincial Market Integration of China——From the Perspective of 3D Framework

作　　者：罗勇[1] 刘锦华[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学经济学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《软科学》2016年第8期6-9,共4页Soft Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CJY059);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJA790080);教育部哲学社会科学重大研究课题攻关项目(10JZD0022);广西大学211四期软科学研究科研基金项目

摘　　要：通过商品市场一体化指数测度中国省域市场一体化程度,采用动态面板模型和系统GMM实证分析在密度、距离、分割的3D框架下中国省域市场一体化的影响因素。研究发现:全国市场一体化水平在波动中上升,东中西部地区呈现出"两边较低,中部偏高"的态势。在全国层面上,密度、距离因素显著推进市场一体化;财政分权阻碍了市场一体化;贸易开放对市场一体化的影响呈现出先抑制后促进的非线性特征。分地区看,部分结果显示出区域性差异,包括中西部地区产出密度阻碍了市场一体化,中部地区财政分权对市场一体化的弱化作用不显著,中西部地区贸易开放度的影响与全国整体相反等。最后,提出无差别公共政策、基础设施建设与地方干预措施等推进国内市场一体化。This paper adopts the commodity market integration index （ MI） to measure market integration of China, and usesdynamic panel model with System GMM to analyze the influencing factors with 3D framework, defined by density, distance,division. The results are as follows： MI shows an upward trend for the whole country. The eastern, central and western regionsexhibit features a high on both sides, low in the center” . At state level, MI is promoted by density and distance factorbut blocked by fiscal decentralization. The trade openness promotes market integration after first suppression. Besides, theproduction density of central and western regions hampers market integration; fiscal decentralization of central region weakensmarket integration not significantly; the results of trade openness of central and western regions are contrary to thewhole. Therefore, non-discriminatory public policies, infrastructure construction and government intervention are proposed.

关 键 词：市场一体化 3D框架 密度 距离 分割 

分 类 号：F207[经济管理—国民经济] F062