检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省铜陵市人民医院急诊外科,安徽铜陵244000
出 处:《临床和实验医学杂志》2016年第15期1523-1525,共3页Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨损伤控制性手术治疗严重创伤性肝破裂的临床效果。方法选择严重创伤性肝破裂行急诊手术的患者共48例,分为研究组与对照组(每组24),研究组予以损伤控制性手术治疗,对照组予以常规手术治疗。比较两组手术效果与并发症的发生率。结果研究组手术时间(134.2±24.5 min)与病死率(12.5%)显著低于对照组(177.3±30.2 min,33.3%),抢救成功率(87.5%)显著高于对照组(66.7%);对照组胆瘘发生率(8.3%)与肺部感染的发生率(33.3%)显著高于研究组(0,16.7%);差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。结论对严重创伤性肝破裂的患者,与常规急诊手术相比,损伤控制性手术可有效缩短手术时间,提高抢救成功率,减少术后并发症的发生。Objective To explore the damage control operation in treatment of severe traumatic liver rupture. Methods A total of 48 pa-tients with severe traumatic liver rupture were collected,and they were divided into study group and control group(n = 24). Damage control oper-ation had been applied in patients of study group,and patients in control group received conventional surgery. The effect of surgical treatment and incidence of complications were compared between these 2 groups. Results The operating time(134. 2 ± 24. 5 min)and mortality rate(12. 5% ) of patients in study group were significantly lower than those of patients in control group(177. 3 ± 30. 2 min,33. 3% ),and the rate of successful rescue(87. 5% )was significantly higher(66. 7% ). The incidence rates of biliary fistula(8. 3% )and pulmonary infections(33. 3% )in pa-tients of control group were significantly higher than those of patients in study group(0,16. 7% ). ConclusionIn comparison with conventional emergerncy surgery for patients with severe traumatic liver rupture,damage control operation for patients with severe traumatic liver rupture can effec-tively shorten the operating time,raise the successful rate and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications,hence it is worthy to be promoted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.254.237