检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张昌辉[1,2]
机构地区:[1]安庆师范大学法学院,安庆246133 [2]南京师范大学法学院,南京210023
出 处:《政法学刊》2016年第3期57-61,共5页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目"司法权威生成的文化机制研究"(12AFX002);安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目"司法意识形态:基本理论及其认同问题研究"(SK2015A386)
摘 要:网络民意有序参与司法具有鲜明的时代背景和深刻的理论基础。从协商民主的角度来看,网络民意参与司法体现了协商民主的精神,表现为民主协商的过程,并以协商型正义为结果。就网络民意的生发过程而言,网络民意应然地昭示和实践着协商民主的精神;就现代司法的正义诉求而言,不管是司法程序内部还是司法与社会之间都体现出民主协商的精神;协商民主由此成为网络民意与现代司法之间的价值纽带,网络民意对司法的参与也因此获得了民主协商的模式,通过协商而达致的协商型正义则成为了网络民意参与司法的理想境界。Online public opinions' participation in justice has distinct background of the times and profound theoretical foundation. From the perspective of deliberative democracy, online public opinion's participation in jus-tice is a process of democratic consultation which reflects the spirit of deliberative democracy in pursuit of agreed justice. As for the growth process of online public opinion, it ought to put the spirit of deliberative democracy into practice. As to the value pursuit of modern justice, the spirit of deliberative democracy is embodied in the judicial process and also in the connection between justice and society. Thus, deliberative democracy becomes the value bond that links online public opinions and justice, democratic consultation becomes the model of online public o-pinions' participation in justice, and the agreed justice through deliberative democracy proves to be the ideal state.
分 类 号:DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166