检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]清华大学社科学院经济所 [2]环境保护部环境与经济政策研究中心
出 处:《南方经济》2016年第7期48-62,共15页South China Journal of Economics
摘 要:文章基于2004-2011年中国分省分行业的工业数据,将地区环境规制程度与行业特征相结合,采用倍差非线性计量模型,实证考察了环境规制强度的省际差异对不同特征行业就业的净影响及其就业集聚效应。实证结果表明:环境规制强度的地区差异导致污染密集型行业的就业呈现向环境规制较为宽松地区集聚的趋势,基于行业就业人数和就业份额的实证结果均比较显著。将工业行业划分为高污染-高资本行业、高污染-低资本行业、低污染-高资本行业和低污染-低资本行业四大类,通过计算环境规制的边际就业效应发现,环境规制会对高污染-高资本密集型行业产生正向的就业效应,环境规制带来的负向就业效应仅在纺织、纺织服装和有色金属采选等高污染的劳动密集型行业表现得比较明显。Based on the industrial data of every province in China from 2004 to 2011, using difference in difference method, the provincial environmental regulation was combined with industrial characteristics to examine the net effects and agglomeration effects of environmental regulation on industrial employment. The results show that provincial difference of environmental regulation intensity cause the industrial employment to agglomerate in looser regulation regions and the empirical tests on industrial employment and its share are all remarkable. Then the industries are divided into four categories: high pollution - high capital intensive industry, high pollution - low capital intensive industry, low pollution - high cap marginal ital intensive industry and low pollution -low capital employment effects of environmental regulation, this intensive industry. Through calculating the paper finds that there are positive effects in high pollution - high capital intensive industry and the obvious negative effects of environmental regulation are only exist in high pollution -labor intensive industries, such as textile, textile garment and no ferrous metals.
分 类 号:F069.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15