检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津工业大学文法学院,天津300387 [2]南开大学法学院,天津300071
出 处:《证券市场导报》2016年第8期64-78,共15页Securities Market Herald
基 金:2014年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"混合所有制企业治理问题研究"(14JJD630006)的阶段性成果
摘 要:证券市场公开承诺的监管应在类型化的前提下依对公众之单方允诺之法理逻辑展开。该类承诺究其本质属于平等主体之间的私的法律关系,却由于证券市场的特殊性,超越了相互制约和自主抗辩的私法自治理念,具有了外部监管和强制监管的正当性。公开承诺的监管体系和制度承袭了我国证券市场监管体制的特征,表现为政府监管强势,自律监管较弱。《证券法》修改在构建公开承诺的监管制度时,应强化交易所一线监管,将有限的政府监管放在利用公开承诺实施欺诈交易的行为上。The public promise in the securities market should be supervised according to the unilateral promise to the public on the premise of categorization. The public promise in the securities market is the relationship between equal subjects. However, because of the particularity of the securities market, the public promise has been beyond private autonomy of mutual restraint and autonomous defense. Therefore, the external and imperative supervision are justified. The paper analyzes the administrative supervision and self-regulation of the public promise. It proposes that when the Securities Law is being revised, the Exchange should play a core role in the supervision of the public promise and administrative supervision should focus on the fraud with the public promise.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15