机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院超声科,辽宁沈阳110004
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2016年第8期551-556,共6页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基 金:辽宁省科技厅科学技术计划项目(2013225049)
摘 要:目的:应用三维斑点追踪成像技术(Three—dimensionalspeckletrackingimaging,3D-STI)探讨初发肾病综合征(Initialonsetofnephroticsyndrome,INS)患儿左心室心肌应变的特征,并初步分析在不同24h尿蛋白总量的患儿中上述指标的变化。方法:收集42例INS患儿(病例组)和30例健康儿童(对照组),对所有受检者进行3D-STI检测,获得三维左心室射血分数(Threc—dimensionalleftventficularejectionfraction,3D-LVEF)、左心室心肌整体纵向峰值应变(LeftventficularglobalIon.gitudinalstrain,LVGLs)、左心室圆周峰值应变(Leftventrieularglobalcircumferentialstrain,LVGCS)、左心室面积峰值应变(Leftventricularglobalareastrain,LVGAS)、左心室径向峰值应变(Leftventricularglobalradialstrain,LVGRS),采用正态性检验选取合适的统计学方法进行两组间上述参数的比较,并随机抽取病例组中20例INS患儿进行组内及组间的重复性检验.绘制散点图。随后将INS患儿(病例组)按照24h尿蛋白总量划分为3组,并比较3组内上述参数的差异。结果:①病例组LVEF与对照组比较无明显变化(P〉0.05)。3D—STI中病例组与对照组相比较,LVGAS与LVGIJs明显减低(P均〈0.01),LVGRS和LVGCS无明显变化。②随机抽取病例组中的20例,经Bland—Altman重复性检验后,得出组间LVGAS、LVGCS、LVGLS、LVGRS的平均差值分别为-0.2、-0.13、0.1及0.2,95%置信区间分别为-2.8%~2.3%、-1.65%~1.29%、-2.1%~2.3%及-3.9%~4-3%;组内LVGAS、LVGCS、LVGLS、LVGRS平均差值分别为0.0、-0.36、-0.4及0.1,95%置信区间分别为-2.9%~2.9%、-2.18%~1.45%、-3.2%~2.4%及-4.4%~4.6%。组内及组间INS病例组应变值有良好的可重复性。⑧对按照24h尿蛋白量所划分的3组间的参数进行比较,仅有LVGAS与LVGLS任3组间有明显的统计学差异,�Objective: To evaluate the characters of global left ventricular (LV) strain in children with initial onset of nephrotie syndrome(INS) by three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging(3D-STI) technique. And to analysis the differences of the above data between the children with various amount of urine protein in 24 h. Methods: Forty-two INS children were randomly enrolled as INS group, and 30 healthy children were employed as normal controls. Three-dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction(3D-LVEF), global left ventricular longitudinal strain(LVGLS), left ventricular circumferential strain(LVGCS), left ventricular area strain(LVGAS) and left ventrieular radial strain(LVGRS) were measured with 3D-STI. All of the data were an- alyzed by normality test to find out the proper statistical approaches. Then we choose 20 groups randomly to do the repeata- bility test. Meanwhile, we draw the scatter diagram. At last, we divided the INS group into 3 groups according to their vari- ous amount of urine protein in 24 h. Results: (1)LVGLS and LVGAS were significant lower in INS group than in normal group (all P〈0.05) while LVGCS and LVGRS have no significant differences. (2)After the Bland-Ahman's repeatability test, it turned out that the 20 groups which were chosen randomly are in good correspondence with each other not only between- group but also in-group. Compared with between-group, the mean difference value of LVGAS, LVGCS, LVGLS and LVGLS are -0.2, -0.13, 0.1 and 0.2 respectively as well as the confidence interval of them are -2.8%-2.3%, -1.65%N1.29%, -2.1% -2.3% and -3.9%-4.3% respectively. When compared with in-group, the mean difference value of LVGAS, LVGCS, LVGLS and LVGLS are 0.0, -0.36, -0.4 and 0.l respectively as well as the confidence interval of them are -2.9%-2.9%, -2.18%- 1.45%, -3.2%-2.4% and -4.4%-4.6% respectively. (3)Compared the data among the 3 INS subgroups, it can be inferred thatonly LVGAS and LVGLS make the significant differences. can g
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...