机构地区:[1]大连医科大学附属第一医院内分泌科,116011
出 处:《中华医学杂志》2016年第32期2554-2558,共5页National Medical Journal of China
基 金:中华医学会临床医学科研专项资金项目(13040720457)
摘 要:目的比较新诊断2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者采用西格列汀和伏格列波糖分别联合实时动态胰岛素泵(SAP)方案的疗效。方法选择2014年2月至2015年2月在大连医科大学附属第一医院内分泌科住院的56例新诊断T2DM患者,糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)9%-11%。将患者随机分为两组,SAP治疗基础上分别加用西格列汀100mg,1次/d(S组,28例)和伏格列波糖0.2mg,3次/d(V组,28例),共9d。同时启用实时持续血糖监测,观察血糖波动参数。本研究通过大连医科大学附属第一医院伦理委员会批准(KY2014-08)。结果两组患者基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。治疗9d后V组及S组空腹血糖(FPG)[(6.4±1.1)比(11.4±3.0)mmol/L,P=0.008;(5.5±0.8)比(11.0±2.1)mmol/L,P〈0.001]、平均血糖(MBG)[(7.5±0.8)比(12.0±1.1)mmol/L,P=0.045;(6.7±0.7)比(12.5±1.3)mmol/L,P=0.002]、平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE)(P=0.024、0.029)、血糖水平标准差(SDBG)(P=0.023、0.036)均较治疗前显著下降,稳态模型胰岛B细胞功能较治疗前显著升高(P=0.002、0.001)。S组日间血糖平均绝对差(MODD)(P=0.027)、空腹血糖变异系数(CV-FPG)(P=0.033)、稳态模型胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)较治疗前显著降低(P=0.039)。V组餐后血糖波动幅度(PPGE)(三餐分别为P=0.003、0.026、0.011)及低血糖指数(LBGI)(P=0.025)较治疗前显著降低,血糖达峰时间(△t)延长(三餐分别为P=0.028、0.026、0.030)。治疗后V组PPGE显著低于S组(三餐分别为P=0.041、0.032、0.036),S组FPG、MBG显著低于V组(P=0.041、0.039)。结论针对新诊断T2DM患者,西格列汀或伏格列波糖联合SAP方案短期均可改善血糖控制,降低血糖波动,保护胰岛功能。西格列汀对平均血�Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between sitagliptin and voglibose both with sensor-augmented insuhn pump (SAP) in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods Fifty-six newly diagnosed hospitalized T2DM patients in Department of Endocrinology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, with hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc) value of 9% - 11%, were randomized into the sitagliptin (S) group ( n = 28 ) and the voglibose (V) group ( n = 28 ) by block randomisation. Participants in S group received sitagliptin 100 mg per day, and V group received voglibose 0. 2 mg for 3 times per day. All patients were treated with SAP for 9 days. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) was used. Glucose variability parameters were observed. The research has been approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (KY2014-08). Results No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all P 〉 0. 05 ). In V group and S group, fasting blood glucose (FPG) [ (6.4± 1.1 ) vs ( 11.4 ± 3. 0) mmo]/L, P=0.008;(5.5±0.8) vs (11.0 ±2.1) mmol/L,P〈0. 001], mean blood glueose(MBG) [(7.5 ± 0.8) vs (12.0±1.1) mmol/L,P=0.045;(6.7±0.7) vs (12.5 ±1.3) mmoL/L,P =0.0021, standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) ( P = 0. 023, 0. 036 ) decreased and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) -β (P = 0. 002, 0. 001 ) increased significantly after 9 days therapy. The mean of daily differences ( MODD ) ( P = 0. 027 ), coefficient of variation-FPG (CV-FPG) ( P = 0. 033 ) and HOMA-IR ( P = 0. 039 ) in S group significantly decreased, while postprandial glyeemie excursion ( PPGE ) ( P = 0. 003, 0. 026, 0. 011, 3 meals respectively)and the low glyeemic index(LBG1) (P = 0. 025 ) in V group decreased, the peak postprandial level of glucose ( At ) was longer compared with before ( P = 0. 028, 0. 026,
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...