检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟兆珂[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省泰安市肿瘤防治院,山东泰安271000
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2016年第15期33-34,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨系统化处方评估联合药学干预对促进医院合理用药的效果。方法本次研究对象选取我院实施药学干预前2013年10月至2014年10月的住院及门诊处方共300张,系统化评估后采用药学干预方式进行纠正,并选取实施药学干预后2014年11月至2016年4月的住院及门诊处方共300张,分析处方不合格率以及不合格原因等相关指标。结果实施药学干预后,门诊及住院处方中不合格处方与实施药学干预前相比明显降低(P<0.05),且抗菌药物的用药频度以及药物利用指数下降程度最为明显,大多数药品药物利用指数接近1。结论系统化处方评估与药学干预能有效地提高临床治疗水平,降低不合理用药率,进一步促进合理用药。Objective To explore the effect of systematic prescription evaluation combined with pharmaceutical intervention on rational drug use in hospital. Methods In this study, 300 pieces of inpatient and outpatient prescription in our hospital during October 2013 to October 2014 were selected, and they were prescription prior to the implementation of the pharmaceutical intervention. Moreover, after the correction of systematic evaluation using pharmaceutical interventions,300 pieces of inpatient and outpatient prescription in our hospital from November 2014 to April 2016 were selected. The disqualification rate of the prescription and related reason for the disqualification were analyzed. Results After the pharmaceutical intervention, the disqualification rate of the outpatient and inpatient prescription is significantly decreased,which is prior to the implementation of the pharmaceutical intervention(P〈0.05), and antibacterial drugs DDDs and drug utilization index show the greatest degree of decline, most of the drug utilization index close to 1. Conclusion Systematic prescription evaluation and pharmaceutical intervention can effectively improve the level of clinical treatment, reduce the irrational drug using rate, and further promote the rational use of drugs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3