检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周建强[1] 丁立[1] 王丽[2] 姜昌华[2] 许玉林[2]
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学生物与医学工程学院,北京100191 [2]中国航天员科研训练中心人因工程重点实验室,北京100094
出 处:《航天医学与医学工程》2016年第4期265-272,共8页Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51175021);国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2014BAK01B05)
摘 要:目的确定典型操控部件工效学评价指标的权重系数,为建立综合评价模型奠定基础。方法利用层次分析法将典型操控部件工效学评价指标体系中的重要指标进行分类,通过典型操控界面工效学专家对指标相对重要性进行调研,分析调整构造矩阵,通过一致性检验后,计算得到各指标的权重。结果通过对调整专家个数获取权重的变化趋势研究,验证了计算结果的可靠性。通过多指标因素的实际操作实验也证明了权重值的可信度。结论可以采用层次分析法和专家调查法对典型操控部件的指标权重开展研究,所得到的指标权重可为典型操控界面设计提供指导。Objective To determine the weight factors of the ergonomics evaluation indices of the typical control device,so as to lay a foundation for establishing a comprehensive evaluation model. Methods The AHP method was used to establish the hierarchy of the relevant ergonomics evaluation indices. Experienced experts in ergonomics evaluation participated in the survey of comparing the relative importance of the ergonomics evaluation indices. The results of the survey were adjusted slightly according to the principle of consistency. The weight factors of indices were calculated according to the adjusted results. Results By comparing the weight factors calculated by different number of experts,the reliability of the calculated weight factors was verified.Through multi factors two levels operation experiments,the reliability of weight factors of indices was also proved. Conclusion AHP and expert survey method can be used to determine the weight factors of the ergonomics evaluation indices of typical control device which can be used as the guidance for the design of typical control device.
分 类 号:R857.1[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15