住宅建设用地使用权续期问题的法律解释困境与出路  

The Dilemma and Outlets on the Statutory Interpretation of Renewal Issues of Use Rights in Residential Construction Land

作　　者：沈开举[1] 方涧[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院

出　　处：《中州学刊》2016年第7期49-54,共6页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"提高农民在征地过程中土地增值收益分配比例立法研究"(13AFX006)

摘　　要：在现行实定法框架下,运用传统的法解释理论对住宅建设用地使用权期满自动续期的法律规定进行文义解释、体系解释、历史解释和目的解释都无法实现法律体系的融贯性,唯有通过合宪性解释才能满足利益平衡的要求。深入剖析住宅建设用地使用权的本质可以发现,其不仅具有财产权属性,受到私法体系的保护,而且具有宪法财产权性质,应当受到宪法的保护。国家不得随意侵犯、随意收回公民的住宅建设用地使用权,不过,这并不意味着房产所有者对住宅建设用地使用权期满续期不需要支付任何形式的费用,只是不应再次缴纳土地出让金。与此相配套,国家应适时实施房产税制度。开征房产税不仅不会破坏对住宅建设用地使用权作为一种宪法财产权的保障,反而是对宪法"维护社会公平"的价值取向的有益实践。Under the current laws,the traditional statutory interpretation of the rule of ＂ automatic renewal of use right in residential construction land＂ through literal,systematic,historical and teleological ways cannot be able to achieve the purpose of coherence. And the need of the balance of interests can be met only through constitutional interpretation. Residential construction land use right of property is not only a kind of common property right,which subjects to the protection of private law system,but also having the nature of the constitutional property right that it should be protected by the constitution. States cannot arbitrarily infringe this right of citizens,and not withdraw the right arbitrarily. But it does not mean that homeowners do not need to pay for any form of fees,contrarily,property tax can be an effective mean to uphold the fairness in constitution.

关 键 词：住宅建设用地使用权 自动续期 法解释学 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]