检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨严炎[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院
出 处:《法学家》2016年第4期143-155,180,共13页The Jurist
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目"我国环境诉讼的模式选择与制度构建研究"(14BFX113);复旦大学"卓学计划";复旦大学人文社会科学青年团队创新项目的阶段性成果
摘 要:科比镇环境侵权诉讼案是英国具有里程碑意义的案件。本案的审判一方面折射出英国环境诉讼的艰难和影响环境诉讼运行的诸多问题,另一方面也涉及民事诉讼证据的多途径搜集和专家证据的运用。该案不仅对改变我国环境诉讼审判方式具有重要的借鉴意义,而且对避免类似环境侵害的发生也具有教育和警示功能。Corby environmental tort case has landmark significant in Britain.The trial of the case reflects the difficulties and hurdles in British environmental litigation on the one hand and on the other hand,it also involves the method of collecting evidence in multiple ways and the use of expert evidence in civil trial,which the courts and the parties pay little or no attention to in our country especially in environmental litigation.While these methods and sufficient grounds of judgment are of great value to ascertain the case facts and urge the losing party to receive the ruling and drop its challenge.The case not only has an important reference for us to change the primitive trail mode in environmental private interest litigation,but also serves lessons and warnings for our country to avoid the occurrence of similar environmental injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.204.192