检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学基础医学院,湖北武汉430071 [2]荆州市第三人民医院,湖北荆州434000 [3]荆州市中心医院产科,湖北荆州434000
出 处:《中外医疗》2016年第21期84-86,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的研究内镜治疗消化道穿孔的临床疗效。方法方便选取该院2014年1月—2016年1月收治的40例消化道穿孔患者随机分为对照组(保守治疗)及研究组(内镜治疗)各20例,比较两组患者临床疗效。结果研究组治疗总有效率90%,高于对照组75%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组各观察指标差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论内镜治疗消化道穿孔疗效确切,可作为临床治疗的优选方案推广使用。Objective To study the clinical effect of endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforation. Methods Convenient selection 40 cases of digestive tract perforation in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were randomly divided into control group(conservative treatment) and study group(endoscopic treatment) of 20 cases, the clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the study group was 90%, higher than that of the control group 75%, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion Endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal perforation is accurate, can be used as a clinical treatment of the preferred program to promote the use of.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188