两种不同类型测汞仪对比观测实验结果分析  

Analysis on Comparison Observation Test Results of Two Different Types of Mercury Detector

作　　者：杨丽[1] 刘峰[1] 官朝康 张淑华 朱培耀[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南省地震局,云南昆明650224 [2]弥勒市地震局,云南弥勒652300

出　　处：《地震研究》2016年第3期479-485,527,共7页Journal of Seismological Research

基　　金：地震科技星火计划项目--痕量汞在线自动分析仪与智能测汞仪的对比观测分析研究资助

摘　　要：在相同观测条件下,选用弥勒弥东哨井,用ATG-6138M型痕量汞在线自动分析仪与DFG-B型和RGBQZ型数字化智能测汞仪进行对比观测实验,由观测数据曲线和仪器参数对比分析结果得出:ATG-6138M型痕量汞在线自动分析仪检出限、灵敏度、稳定性等较DFG-B型和RG-BQZ型数字化智能测汞仪好,ATG-6138M型痕量汞在线自动分析仪观测数据曲线有明显的日变形态,能记录到同震变化。Under the same observation condition, we selected Midongshao Well in Mile and compared the observation curves recorded by ATG - 6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer and DFG - B and RG - BQZ Digital Intel- ligent Mercury Detectors. The comparison result of observation curve and the instrument parameter showed that the detection limit, sensitivity and stability of ATG -6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer were better than that of DFG - B and RG - BQZ Digital Intelligent Mercury Detectors. The observation curve recorded by ATG - 6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer had the obvious the daily variation, and could record the co-seismic variation.

关 键 词：汞观测 测汞仪 对比分析 同震响应 

分 类 号：P315.63[天文地球—地震学]