检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄鹂[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院金融研究所,北京100732 [2]河南工程学院经济贸易学院,河南郑州451191
出 处:《河南工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期11-17,共7页Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:综观我国新型工业化评价指标体系及水平测度问题,构建测量地区新型工业化发展水平的指标评价体系,用熵值法计算全国30个省市新型工业化发展水平的综合得分,结果表明:从四大地区新型工业化发展水平综合平均得分来看,东部地区最高,然后依次是中部地区、东北地区和西部地区;从各省(直辖市、自治区)来看,各地区新型工业化水平差异较显著,但四大区域中,都有新型工业化发展较好和较快的省市,它们已成为区域新型工业化道路的领头羊。In the light of and measure of level of regional new-type industrialization in China,constructing evaluation index system of regional new-type industrialization,the entropy method is used to calculate the comprehensive scores of development of new-type industrialization in China' s 30 provinces and cities( municipalities and autonomous regions). The result shows that the eastern region gets the highest comprehensive scores. The second highest one is the central region followed by northeast region and the last one is the northwest region. According to the score of the provinces and cities,the differences of development of new-type industrialization are obvious. But among the four great regions,there are some provinces and cities where new-type industrialization develops very well,and they have become the bellwether of regional new-type industrialization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3