结果加重犯之罪过新论  

New perceptions of the sins of aggregated consequential offense

作　　者：童春荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期157-164,共8页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：重庆市研究生科研创新项目"刑民界限新论--基于不得已原则视角"(CYB14025)

摘　　要：传统结果加重犯理论强调加重结果对犯罪认定的决定作用,暧昧结果加重犯之主观罪过,割裂行为主客观方面的内在联系,曲解行为概念的实质意蕴,陷入罪过判断的误区。为拨误反正,结果加重犯的判断需要在肯定罪过原则的基础上颠覆传统罪过理论之纯粹主观心态的偏见认识,肯定主观罪过在犯罪认定中的核心作用,并从主观罪过的内容及其实现程度考察行为的因果发展进程。同时,明确行为概念的控制内涵,揭示犯罪本质源起刑法所保护利益的对立意志,进而从行为人的罪过把握结果加重犯。Traditional theory of aggravated consequential offense emphasizes the decision of aggravated result of crime, blurs the subjective aspect of the crime to the aggravated consequential offense, splits the behavior of the subjective aspect and objective aspect, distorts the concept of behavior, and falls in judgment errors. Therefore, we need to ensure fault principle, correct prejudices in the traditional culpability theory that judges the crime purely due to actor＇ s subjective state of mind, affirm the core role of subjective fault in the identification of crime, and investigate the development process and its realization degree of behavior cause and effect from the subjective fault. At the same time, we need to clearly define the control connotation of behavior concept, reveal the essence of the crime origination and protect the opposite will interests in the criminal law, then grasp aggregated consequential offense from the sins of feason.

关 键 词：结果加重犯 因果关系 罪过 行为 

分 类 号：D917.7[政治法律—法学]