检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王海军[1] 王洪铸[1] 赵伟华[1,2] 沈亚强[1,3] 茹辉军[1,4] 梁小民[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院水生生物研究所、淡水生态与生物技术国家重点实验室,武汉430072 [2]长江科学院流域水环境研究所,武汉430010 [3]浙江省嘉兴市农业科学研究院,嘉兴314016 [4]中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,武汉430223
出 处:《水生生物学报》2016年第5期1003-1011,共9页Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica
基 金:水利部公益性行业科研专项(编号:2007SHZ1-19);中国科学院青年创新促进会(编号:20143121)资助~~
摘 要:为对黄河的生态健康进行评价,调查了2008年春、秋两季干流14个河段和4座水库,并选择高等植物、底栖动物及鱼类群落特征等参数进行评价。生物评价结果既有效反映了水质和基质的空间格局,又有其自身分布特点。总体来说,上游的兰州以下河段及下游各河段的健康状况较差,中游各河段相对较好。回归分析表明了各种水文和泥沙过程对生物群落发展和生态健康的重要影响。文章最后就黄河生态系统健康的维持提出了管理建议。The current study assessed the health status of the Yellow River ecosystem based on macrophytes, zoobenthos, fishes and their environments from investigation in Spring and Autumn, 2008 on 14 segments and 4 reservoirs on the mainstem. The results showed a high variation in health status among river segments with healthier segements concentrated in the middle reaches. The results of biological ansalysis reflected the spatial distributions of water quality and substrates of the river. Segments below Lanzhou were poor in water quality. The lower segments were better in quality but unstable in shore shapes. Segments of these two regions were therefore relative poor in eco-health. Comparatively, the middle segments were better in eco-health due to the light pollution and stable substrate. Regression analysis showed vital roles of hydrological and sediment processes in the development of biological assemblages. These findings support the importance and requirement to establish biological indexes to assess the eco-health and maintain the eco-health of the Yellow River.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62