王道与霸道——兼论传统文化对解决两岸分歧问题的启示  

Wangdao and Badao: A Confucian Perspective for Resolving Cross-Strait Differences

作　　者：谢大宁[1] Shao Yanan 

机构地区：[1]台湾佛光大学中文系,教授台湾宜兰26247

出　　处：《孔学堂》2015年第3期57-63,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,共17页Confucian Academy

摘　　要："王道"与"霸道"这两个词汇,在今天用语习惯中,经常作为完全相反的价值指述,但如果我们仔细考察这两个词汇的历史,就会发现除了孟子外,在儒家传统中,无论孔子与荀子,都没有那么截然地把"王"与"霸"对举起来。相反的,荀子虽然也讲王道,但通常只把它当成是理想世界的陈述,而霸道恐怕才是王道在现实中的样态。本文并试图将这样的概念引申到对两岸关系的关照之中,希望借古人的智慧,可以提供我们在解决两岸问题时的一些参考。In contemporary Chinese,wangdao（kingly way） and badao（hegemonic way） are often used to represent opposite values.However,a closer look at their historical contexts reveals that,except for Mencius,ancient Confucian philosophers did not directly set these two terms in opposition.While stressing the importance of wangdao,Xunzi regarded it as a projection of the ideal world,arguing that badao was one manifestation of wangdao in reality.This paper applies these concepts to cross-strait relations,in the hope that the wisdom of the ancients can help resolve the differences between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait.

关 键 词：王道 霸道 礼仪之统 两岸关系 天下 

分 类 号：G122[文化科学]