地方人大立法后评估的实施与效果——以上海市控烟条例执法检查为例  

Implementation and Effect of Local Council's Post-Legislation Assessment:The Case of Shanghai Smoking Control Law Enforcement Inspection

作　　者：刘伟伟[1] 黄科豪 

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院国际事务与公共管理学院,上海201701

出　　处：《华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期104-114,共11页Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

基　　金：上海政法学院创新性学科团队建设项目;上海政法学院青年科研基金项目。本文部分资料来自刘伟伟在上海市人大挂职期间(2011.10-2012.5)调研所得

摘　　要：近年来,地方政策往往以立法的形式予以实施。通观整个政策过程,立法往往只意味一个政策的开端而非终结。评定一个地方性政策的质量,关注的不仅仅是立法的水平,更值得重视的是立法之后的执行状况。因此,人大执法检查日益成为来保障政策执行的重要方式。执法检查从功能上来说是一种政策评估手段。地方性法规是一种公共政策,地方人大常委会的执法检查作为一种立法后评估,是政策评估。本文以上海市控烟条例执法检查为例,运用政策评估相关理论,分析了执法检查的效果以及执法检查存在的检查对象错位和缺乏监督机制等问题。In recent years,local policies tend to be implemented in the form of legislation. Throughout the entire policy process,legislation is only the beginning. Assessing the quality of a local policy is concerned not only the legislative level,but also the status of implementation of legislation. Therefore,the law enforcement inspection becomes a very popular manner to guarantee the implementation of policies. Law enforcement inspection is a policy assessment tool. In this article, we would take Shanghai Smoking Control Law enforcement inspection for example, analyze its effect. The main problems of present law enforcement inspection are： wrong positioning,and lack of oversight mechanisms.

关 键 词：政策评估 立法后评估 执法检查 控烟 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]