检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州吴江区第一人民医院CT与MR室,江苏苏州215200
出 处:《现代医学》2016年第7期936-939,共4页Modern Medical Journal
基 金:苏州市2013年科技发展计划项目(SYSD2013046)
摘 要:目的:与冠状动脉造影术(CAG)及血管内超声(IVUS)相比,探究双源CT(DSCT)在冠状动脉狭窄与斑块定量中的临床价值。方法:以50例冠状动脉病变患者为研究对象,分析其CAG、DSCT及IVUS检查结果,对DSCT的临床价值进行评估。结果:以CAG为基准,DSCT对病变冠状动脉的阳性及阴性预测值分别为97%(106/109)、98%(87/89),灵敏度、特异性均为97%(106/109,87/90);对狭窄度<50%冠状动脉检测的敏感性为82.50%,对狭窄度>50%冠状动脉检测的敏感性为94.07%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对近中段及远段狭窄段检测的敏感性分别为92.22%、74.19%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。DSCT检测斑块的平均血管面积、管腔面积、斑块面积、狭窄程度及斑块偏心指数与IVUS比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:DSCT对冠状动脉狭窄及斑块定量的诊断准确性较高,值得临床推广。Objective: To investigate the clinical value of dual source CT( DSCT) for coronary artery stenosis and the quantitative research of plaque based on coronary angiography( CAG) and intravascular ultrasound( IVUS).Methods: Fifty cases of coronary artery disease were enrolled in this study. Data of CAG,DSCT and intravascular ultrasound( IVUS) were analyzed and the clinical value of DSCT was evaluated. Results: Compared with CAG,the positive / negative predictive value of diseased coronary artery were 97%( 106 /109),98%( 87 /89) respectively and sensitivity and specificity were 97%( 106 /109) and 97%( 87 /90) respectively. The sensitivity for detecting lesion section in 50% stenosis were 82. 50%( 66 /80) and in 50% stenosis were 94. 07%( 111 /118)( P〈0. 05). The sensitivity for proximal was 92. 22%( 154 /167),middle segment and distal segment were 74. 19%( 23 /31)( P〈0. 05). The difference between DSCT and IVUS for plaque quantity evaluating was not statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: There is a high accuracy of DSCT on detection coronary artery stenosis and is worthy to promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31