检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院肾内科,100029 [2]卫计委中日友好医院胃肠外科,北京100029
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第9期1217-1220,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2011-2006-07)
摘 要:目的 研究团体认知饮食护理方案在腹膜透析患者中的应用效果.方法 选择2012年12月—2013年12月行腹膜透析的40例患者为对照组,2014年1—12月行腹膜透析的40例患者为研究组.两组患者均进行12周的护理干预.对照组患者采用常规护理方法 ,研究组患者采用团体认知饮食护理,比较护理干预前后两组患者的生活质量以及焦虑抑郁评分,比较两组护理满意度.结果 干预后,两组患者的生存质量、焦虑、抑郁评分差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).研究组的护理满意度为97.5%,高于对照组的77.5%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论 团体认知饮食护理方案能够有效改善腹膜透析患者的生活质量.Objective To explore the application effects of group cognitive diet nursing program in patients with peritoneal dialysis. Methods From December 2012 to December 201340 patients with peritoneal dialysis were selected as control group and 40 patients with peritoneal dialysis in study group were chosen from January to December in 2014. All patients received 12 weeks of nursing intervention. Patients in the control group were treated with routine nursing, and the patients of study group were treated with group cognitive diet nursing. We compared patients′ quality of life, anxiety and depression scores of two groups before and after nursing intervention, and the nursing satisfaction of the two groups. Results After the intervention, the quality of life, anxiety and depression scores of the two groups were statistically significant (P〈0. 05). The nursing satisfaction in the study group was 97. 5%, higher than that of the control group (77. 5%), and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0. 05). Conclusions Group cognitive diet nursing can effectively improve the quality of life of patients with peritoneal dialysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147