养老机构患者安全文化调查表的信效度评价  

Reliability and validity assessment of Chinese version of nursing home survey on patient safety culture

作　　者：谢燕[1] 喻秀丽[1] 甘霈[1] 童立纺[1] 何海燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院青杠老年护养中心,400016

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第10期1337-1340,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

基　　金：2010年国家临床重点专科护理建设项目（财社[2010]305号）;重庆医科大学附属第一医院护理科研基金课题（HLJJ2012-12）

摘　　要：目的：对养老机构患者安全文化调查表（ NHSPSC）进行汉化并检测其中文版的信效度。方法翻译、回译及文化调试确定中文版NHSPSC的条目,应用中文版量表对237名养老机构工作人员进行调查,评定量表的信效度。结果中文版NHSPSC量表共36个条目,Cronbach′s α系数为0.847,重测信度为0.822；各维度Cronbach′s α系数为0.632-0.832,各维度间的相关系数为0.151-0.728,各维度与量表总分的相关系数为0.294-0.779（P〈0.05）,量表内容效度CVI值为0.873。探索因子分析共提取12个公因子,累计贡献率为63.156%。结论中文版NHSPSC量表具有良好的信效度,可作为国内养老机构患者安全文化的评价工具。Objective To translate the English version of nursing home survey on patient safety culture （NHSPSC） into Chinese one, and to test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of NHSPSC. Methods The items of NHSPSC were translated into Chinese version using a standard procedure of double-back translation and cross-culture adapted. A total of 237 staff members of nursing home were recruited to examine the reliability and validity of Chinese version of NHSPSC. Results The Chinese version of NHSPSC consisted of 36 items. The Cronbach′s α coefficient was 0. 847 for the total scale and Cronbach′s α of each factors ranged from 0. 632 to 0. 832. The test-retest reliability was 0. 822. The correlation coefficient between each dimension score ranged from 0. 151 to 0. 728 and the correlation coefficient between each dimension and the total score ranged from 0. 294 to 0. 779. The content validity index was 0. 873. Twelve factors were extracted by factor analysis which could explain 63. 156% of the total variance. Conclusions The Chinese version of NHSPSC is reliable and valid, which can be used to evaluate the patient safety culture in nursing homes.

关 键 词：养老机构 患者安全文化 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R197.7[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] D669.6[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]