建筑类型问题:从厅、堂说起——居住:从中国传统住宅到相关问题系列研究之二  

On Principles of Categorization of Chinese Architecture:Domesticity:A Serial Study on Chinese Traditional House and Relevant Issues Ⅱ

作　　者：诸葛净[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学建筑学院建筑历史与理论研究所

出　　处：《建筑师》2016年第4期6-12,共7页The Architect

摘　　要：中国古代建筑的分类问题始终令人困惑,不同文献中提及的类型无论在名称还是在分类标准上都没有明显的规则。本文试图由厅、堂在不同时期的实例和文献中的涵义出发,分析中国古代建筑知识中是否存在可理解的分类标准。最终本文将指出中国古代建筑文本中,建筑分类事实上包含三种话语:意识形态,匠作体系,国家制度。这一方面解释了表面上混乱的分类原则,另一方面也表明对中国古代建筑的认识必须基于对此三种话语既区分又整合的考虑。Classification of Chinese traditional architecture is always a confusing issue in terms of both category and classification principles. This paper tries to explore the meaning of Ting and Tang in text material and existing architectures to figure out if there were some understandable principles of classifying in ancient Chinese architectural knowledge through. This paper argues that there are three different discourse related with Chinese architectural categories in ancient documents. They were ideological discourse, knowledge from handicraftsmen, and management system of the state. Recognition of these three different discourses could not only explain the confusing classification principles but also reveal an approach to Chinese traditional architecture on base of the comprehensive aspects.

关 键 词：类型 厅堂 意识形态 匠作体系 国家制度 

分 类 号：TU241.5[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]