检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翁艳秋 张玲娟[1] 郝建玲[1] 冯苹[2] 胡敏[3]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学长海医院护理部,上海200433 [2]第二军医大学长海医院烧伤监护室 [3]第二军医大学长海医院急诊科
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2016年第13期59-61,64,共4页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
摘 要:目的探讨成批烧(创)伤患者联合急救护理模式在爆炸事故救援中的效果。方法以联合急救护理模式实施前我院救治的某公交爆炸事件以及某地火灾共31名重度烧伤患者为对照组,以某地爆炸事故10名特重度烧伤患者为观察组,观察组采用联合急救护理模式,对照组采用常规急救护理模式,比较两组患者的急诊预检分诊时间以及通过急诊达到烧伤ICU的时间。结果两组患者均得到妥善救治。对照组急诊预检分诊时间为(3.06±0.67)分,通过急诊到达烧伤ICU时间为(8.99±0.59)分;观察组急诊预检分诊时间为(0.57±0.12)分,到达烧伤ICU时间为(6.63±0.78)分。上述两项两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论联合急救护理模式能有效缩短急诊预检分诊时间,为成批伤患者赢得更多救治时间,临床切实可行,值得推广。Objective To discuss the effect of joint emergency care model on batch burning(trauma) pa- tient's treatment.Methods Totally 10 patients in Kunshan explosion were selected as the observational group,31 patients in bus explosion were selected as control group.The observation group was applied with joint emergency care model.The control group was applied with conventional emergency rescue model.The pre-examination and triage time and time from emergency to BICU were compared between two groups.Re- sults The two groups of patients were all properly treated.The pre-examination and triage time in control group was (3.06+0.67) minutes,arriving at BICU through the emergency department time was (8.99 + 0. 59 ) minutes. The pre-examination and triage time in observation group was (0.57 + 0.12) minutes, arriving at BICU time was (6.63 +0.78)minutes (all P〈0.05).Conclusions The joint emergency care modelcan effectively shorten the pre-examination and triage time, and win more rescue time for batch wounded pa- tients,which is worth for clinical trial.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145