检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李刚[1]
出 处:《法学杂志》2016年第9期114-124,共11页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:文章以党的十八大报告确立的"推动省以下地方法院、检察院人财物统一管理"这一司法体制改革的基本目标为出发点,通过对检察一体原则进行重新解读和对目前检察机关上下级领导关系进行审视,力图在"人财物省级以下统管"背景下,给出优化检察机关上下级领导关系的合理化建议。通过分析,认为未来检察机关内部权力过度集中于上级检察机关、基层检察机关过于式微,是上下级检察机关关系健康发展的主要隐患,因而在机制设置上,应突出基层检察机关和检察官的主体性,明确检察官的客观义务,根据检察机关内部各部门自身司法或行政属性的强弱,实行分类管理。The Party' s eighteenth report has established the goal of promoting unified management of court and procuratorate below the provincial level. This article expounds around the goal, and through reinterpretating of procuratorial integration principle and scanning the leadership relations between the superior and the subordinate procuratorate, then attempts to give some reasonable suggestions which can optimize the leadership relations under the background of unified management below the provincial level. The main hidden danger of sound development of the leadership relations is the trend that the internal power may excessively concentrates in the superior procuratorial organs, while the subordinate procuratorate declines too much. Therefore we should design the institution that can extrude the subjectivity of grassroots procuratorate and prosecutors, specify the objective obligation of prosecutors, and manage different inner department on its merits such as judicial or administrative nature.
关 键 词:司法体制改革检察一体原则 客观义务分类管理
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62