干预与自由:新保守主义与二战后丘吉尔政府经济选择  

Intervention and Freedom: Neo- conservatism and Economic Choices of Churchill Government after World War Ⅱ

作　　者：赵北平[1] 王超[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学历史学院,北京100875 [2]山东英才学院商学院,济南250104

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2016年第4期19-24,共6页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：二战后保守主义指导思想导致英国保守党在1945年大选中失利。为上台执政,保守党被迫左转,实行新保守主义,采取国家干预与自由相结合的混合经济模式。然而保守党的左转并不彻底,两党的共识政治也不稳定,新保守主义中的国家干预与经济自由比重在丘吉尔政府执政初期屡经变化。政府实行的Robot计划的失败与钢铁部门的去国有化政策表明,国家干预最终战胜经济自由,两党共识最终形成。After World War II, the conservatism ideology of conservative party in England led its failure in e- lection in 1945. For obtaining the ruling position, conservative party had to turn left and change the original conser- vatism ideology in order that it could operate neo-conservatism ideology and adopt a mixed economy where state in- tervention and economic freedom combined. This neo-conservatism ideology contributed to the form of consensus politics. However, this turn left was not complete and the consensus politics between the two parties was not stable, proportion between state intervention and economic freedom in neo-conservatism ideology was often changeable The failure of Robot Plan and de-nationalization in Iron and steel sector showed that state intervention finally defea- ted economic freedom and consensus politics between the two parties was eventually established.

关 键 词：新保守主义 共识政治 Robot计划 去国有化 

分 类 号：F156.1[经济管理—世界经济]