检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都医学院结构特异性小分子药物研究实验室,四川成都610500 [2]四川省疾病预防控制中心,四川成都610041 [3]成都医学院第一附属医院,四川成都610513
出 处:《食品与生物技术学报》2016年第7期734-738,共5页Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(81373454);四川省科技厅重点科技项目(2013jy0065)
摘 要:比较替加环素对鲍曼不动杆菌的体外药敏试验不同方法之间的差异。分别采用微量肉汤稀释法、琼脂稀释法和K-B法测定119株临床分离鲍曼不动杆菌对替加环素的敏感性,比较不同检测方法结果的差异。微量肉汤稀释法MIC500.5μg/m L、MIC901μg/m L,FDA/EUCAST的耐药率0.0%(0/119)/0.0%(0/119),中介率0.0%(0/119)/5.0%(6/119),敏感率100%(119/119)/95.0%(113/119);琼脂稀释法MIC501μg/m L、MIC904μg/m L,FDA/EUCAST耐药率11.7%(14/119)/45.4%(54/119),中介率33.6%(40/119)/21.0%(25/119),敏感率54.7%(65/119)/33.6%(40/119);K-B法Jone/EUCAST的敏感率47.1%(56/119)/31.9%(38/119)、中介率48.74%(58/119)/31.9%(38/119),耐药率4.2%(5/119)/36.2%(43/119)。替加环素对鲍曼不动杆菌体的外药敏实验中,微量肉汤稀释法、琼脂稀释法和K-B法之间存在差异。以微量肉汤稀释法为参考方法,MH琼脂稀释法总误差41.2%-60.5%,K-B法总误差47.9%-63.9%。To evaluate different tigecyclin susceptibility testing methods for Acinetobacter baumannii. A total of 119 clinical A.baumannii isolates were collected and tigecycline susceptibilities were tested by the broth microdilution,agar dilution and disk diffusion. The results of three test methods were compared. The MIC_(50) and MIC90values obtained by broth microdilution method were0.5 μg/m L,1 μg/m L respectively,the(FDA/EUCAST breakpoint) susceptible rates were 100%(119/119)/95.0%(113/119),intermediate rates were 0.0%(0/119)/5.0%(6/119)and resistant rates were 0.0%(0/119)/0.0%(0/119). The MIC_(50) and MIC90values obtained by agar dilution method were2 μg/m L,4 μg/m L respectively,the(FDA/EUCAST breakpoint) susceptible rates were 54.7%(65/119)/33.6%(40/119),intermediate rates were 33.6%(40/119)/21.0%(25/119)and resistant rates were 11.7%(14/119)/45.4%(54/119).The disk diffusion method(FDA/EUCAST breakpoint)resistant rates were 4.2%(5/119)/36.2%(43/119),intermediate rates were 48.74%(58/119)/31.9%(38/119)and susceptible rates were 47.1%(56/119)/31.9%(38/119). There were significant differences on susceptible rates among broth microdilution(BDM),agar dilution(ADM) and disk diffusion. As broth microdilution method was reference method,the total error rates of agar dilution method were 41.2%~60.5% and the total error rates of disk diffusion were 47.9%~63.9%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28