检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄苗[1] 肖永华[1] 刘晓峰[2] 王世东[1] 申颖[1]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学东直门医院,北京100700 [2]北京中医药大学基础医学院,北京100029
出 处:《中国中医药信息杂志》2016年第10期42-45,共4页Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:北京市薪火传承"3+3"工程(JB059);国家中医药管理局全国名老中医药专家传承工作室建设项目(JB063);北京中医药大学薪火传承研究项目(JX150)
摘 要:目的探讨将名老中医辨证论治的思维过程具体化和量化方法,从而更有效地传承医家经验和思路。方法选取吕仁和教授门诊治疗慢性肾炎的典型医案1例,采用《中医学主题词表》对症状及处方进行标引,运用中医处方智能分析系统(CPIAS)量化分析处方相对药量、综合药性、综合药味、综合归经、处方功效等。结果典型医案含初诊、六诊2首处方,通过CPIAS量化分析得出的相对药量、综合药味、处方功效与吕仁和教授治疗慢性肾炎的辨证思路相符。结论该方法对于继承吕仁和教授治疗慢性肾炎的思辨规律和学术思想具有指导意义。Objective To discuss the methods of specification and quantification of thinking process of syndrome differentiation and treatment of old and famous TCM practitioners; To inherit the clinical experience and ideas of TCM practitioners more effectively. Methods Based on one typical case of Professor Lv Renhe treating chronic nephritis, indexing the prescriptions with TCM Subject Headings thesaurus and analyzing them with "Chinese medicine prescription intelligence analysis system"("CPIAS" for short), relative dose, comprehensive property, comprehensive taste, comprehensive channel tropism, and prescription efficacy were under quantitative analysis. Results The typical case included two prescriptions of initial diagnosis and six diagnosis. CPIAS quantitative analysis showed that relative dose, comprehensive property, comprehensive taste, comprehensive channel tropism, and prescription efficacy were in accordance with syndrome differentiation and treatment of Professor Lv Renhe for chronic nephritis. Conclusion This method has guiding significance for studying and inheriting the speculative regularities and academic thoughts of Professor Lv Renhe.
分 类 号:R272.969.23[医药卫生—中医儿科学] R2-05[医药卫生—中医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30