检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈波[1] 郑烨 王菲[1] 李娜[1] 蒋静静[1] 卢山[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学建筑工程学院,杭州310018 [2]宁波甬政园林建设有限公司,浙江宁波315000
出 处:《浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第5期788-795,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University(Natural Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51008282);浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY16E080009)
摘 要:以宁波城市公园的30个典型植物群落为研究对象,对其物种组成、树种重要值、群落类型和物种多样 性进行调查分析,建立综合的评价体系,从生态度、景观度和节约度三个要素上选取12个评价因子,采用层次分析法 进行综合节约性评价.评价结果显示:宁波城市公园30个植物群落综合评价等级中,I级有5个,占总数的16. 67% ; II级有23个,占总数的76. 66 %; HI级的有2个,占总数的6.67%,表明宁波的城市公园植物群落配置总体较 好,但仍存在提升空间.针对宁波城市公园植物群落存在的问题,提出了建议与优化配置模式.In this paper,thirty typical plant communities in Ningbo city parks were surveyed.The species composition,importance value of tree species,coenotype and species diversity of these communities were investigated and analyzed.Through the investigation,a comprehensive evaluation system was established and 12 evaluation factors were selected from three elements(ecology,landscape and conservation)to make a comprehensive conservation-oriented evaluation of 30 typical plant communities by adopting the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).The results show that,in the comprehensive evaluation grade of the 30 plant communities in Ningbo city parks,5plant communities are evaluated as Grade I,accounting for 16.67% of all communities;23plant communities are evaluated as Grade II,accounting for76.66%;2plant communities are evaluated as Grade III,accounting for 6.67%.This indicates that the plant community configuration in Ningbo city parks is generally good,but there is still room for improvement.On the basis of the research and evaluation results,this paper gives some suggestions and optimized arrangement models for plant communities in Ningbo city parks.
分 类 号:TU986.2[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28