检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院第二普通外科,沈阳110004
出 处:《中国微创外科杂志》2016年第9期784-786,共3页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨经脐单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术的安全性、可行性。方法回顾性分析2009年6月~2014年12月我科经脐单切口(189例)和三孔(123例)腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床资料,均经临床表现、彩超或CT诊断为阑尾炎,排除病例资料不全、联合其他手术、妊娠期阑尾炎、急性阑尾炎发病超过72小时者。比较2组术中、术后资料。结果 2组均无中转开腹,经脐组与三孔组手术时间、术后排气时间、术后住院日差异无显著性[(45.5±12.7)min vs.(46.3±17.8)min,t=-0.461,P=0.650;(1.4±0.5)d vs.(1.5±0.6)d,t=-1.588,P=0.112;(3.8±1.6)d vs.(4.1±1.9)d,t=-1.554,P=0.121],经脐组术后3个月美容评分高[(4.5±0.6)分vs.(4.2±0.5)分,t=4.585,P=0.000],2组并发症发生率、病理类型等无统计学差异,其中经脐组切口感染3例,三孔组4例。结论经脐单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术技术上安全可行,且美容效果较好。Objective To discuss the safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). Methods A retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of patients diagnosed as having appendicitis by clinical manifestations, ultrasound or computer tomography at our department from June 2009 to December 2014. There were 189 cases of transumbilical SILA (transumbilical group) and 123 cases of traditional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (three-port group). Patients with incomplete records, combination with other surgery, pregnancy appendicitis, acute appendicitis over 72 hours were excluded. Intraoperative and postoperative data of two groups were compared. Results No conversion to open surgery was required in both groups. The operation time, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the transumbilical group and the three-port group [(45.5 ±12.7) rain vs. (46.3 ±17.8) rain, t= -0.461, P=0.650; (1.4 ±0.5) d vs. (1.5 ±0.6) d, t= -1.588, P=0.112; (3.8±1.6) d vs. (4.1±1.9) d, t= -1.554, P=0.121]. The cosmetic scores at3 months after surgery was higher in the transumbilical group than that in the three-port group [ (4.5 ±0.6) points vs. (4.2 ±0.5) points, t =4. 585, P = 0. 0001. No significant differences were identified in the incidence of complications and pathological types between the two groups. Conclusion SILA is technically feasible and safe with better cosmetic effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.205.101