检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙遥[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院,济南250100
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2016年第9期90-93,共4页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:2014-2015年国家留学基金委员会项目(201406220008)
摘 要:2010年开始的美国新医改对其联邦医疗保险计划(Medicare)进行了大规模的改革,主要从医疗机构服务项目及医疗保险优惠计划等方面,削减了之前对Medicare的政府投入约7 160亿美元,并同时填补了Medicare Part D中此前由个人承担的,约3 920美元的处方药物承保缺口。这两项矛盾的举措对美国老年人的医疗权益产生了巨大影响,可能使未来老年人的参保、就医、护理与用药成为难题。奥巴马医改的出发点是好的,但最终举措不当导致了目标偏离,从"患者保护"悄然转变为了"政府可负担"。Since 2010, a wholesale reform was conducted on Medicare in the new medical reform of the US, mainly on medical in- stitution service items and medical insurance preferential program. The Medicare government input(716 billion dollars) were cut off, while the fiscal cut of prescription drug (3 920 dollars) which were taken by individuals in Medicare Part D. These two confliction mea- surement had great effects on the health care equity of the elder American, which could be challenges for future anticipation for medi- cal insurance, visiting doctors, nursing and prescription drug for the ehterly. The goal of Obamacare was great, but the inappropriate fi- nal measurement deviated from its original goal, which altered from "patient protection" to "affordahle to the government".
分 类 号:R199[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3