番茄嫁接劈接法和套管嫁接法对比试验  

Comparison Test of Tamato Casing Grafting and Cleft Grafting

作　　者：梁祖珍[1] 潘玲华[1] 刘春惠[1] 吴永琼[1] 邓飞鹏 

机构地区：[1]桂林市蔬菜研究所,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《南方园艺》2016年第4期9-12,共4页Southern Horticulture

基　　金：国家现代农业产业技术体系广西大宗蔬菜创新团队桂林综合试验站任务(桂林nycytxgxcxtd-03-10-6);广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻13254002-3);广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻1598006-2F);桂林市科学研究与技术开发计划项目(20130112-1)

摘　　要：通过引进番茄套管嫁接法进行试验,并与传统劈接法对比。结果表明,套管嫁接法与劈接法比较,成活率比较稳定,在90%以上,嫁接速度快,嫁接苗种植后生物学特性及产量均没有明显差异;嫁接工具易于把持,切削砧木与接穗减少3刀,套管在嫁接苗成长后自动脱落。Throug the comparison study of tomato casing grating comparing to the traditional cleft grafting, the result showed that tomato casing grafting had a more steady survival rate above 90%.Casing grafting required less time than cleft grafting .The result also illustrated the biological characteristics and yields of casing grafted seedlings and cleft graftedseedlings were not significantly different. Besides, the tools of casing grafting were easy to handle and casing grafting reduced 3 cutting steps than the original ones. The tube would fall off when the grafted seedlings grown up.

关 键 词：番茄 劈接和套管嫁接 对比 

分 类 号：S641[农业科学—蔬菜学]