兰州地区某会议室不同空调方式设计方案对比  

Comparison of Design Schemes are Performed for Different Air Handling Progress in Lanzhou

作　　者：胡文婷[1] 王烨[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]兰州交通大学环境与市政工程学院,兰州730070 [2]兰州交通大学铁道车辆热工教育部重点实验室,兰州730070

出　　处：《制冷与空调（四川）》2016年第4期413-418,共6页Refrigeration and Air Conditioning

基　　金：甘肃省自然科学基金(1308RJZA151)

摘　　要：分别采用传统空调方法和蒸发冷却空调方法对兰州地区某会议室内的夏季空调过程进行了设计计算,得到了两种空气处理方法的设计参数值。从可行性、经济性、系统调节性、室内空气品质以及对环境的影响等方面对两种方案进行了对比,发现蒸发冷却式空调系统在以兰州为代表的低湿度地区优势突出:与其他空调方式相比,其空气处理过程简单、设计简便、调节便利。To design the indoor air handling process of a meeting room in Lanzhou in summer, traditional air-conditioning method and evaporative cooling air-conditioning method are used to obtain the parameters for selecting equipment, respectively. The two schemes are compared from the aspects of feasibility, economy, system adjustment, indoor air quality and the influence on environment. The results indicate that the evaporative cooling air-conditioning system has a distinct advantage in the low humidity region as Lanzhou： it is simpler to deal with the air and more convenient to design and adjust the air-conditioning system.

关 键 词：蒸发冷却式空调系统 传统空调系统 设计计算 方案对比 低湿度地区 

分 类 号：TU831.3[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]