擅开飞机舱门行为的法律适用——以中国首起擅开飞机舱门受审案为例  

Thinking about the Law Application of the Behavior of Opening Airplane Cabin Door without Authorization---- Chinese First Opening Airplane Cabin Door without Authorization Case on Trial as an Example

作　　者：杨惠[1] 周航[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国民航大学,天津300300

出　　处：《中国人民公安大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期31-37,共7页Journal of People’s Public Security University of China:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中国法学会重点专项课题"中国积极参与国际民航规则制定研究"(CLS(2015)ZDXZZ)的阶段性成果;中央高校人文社科专项课题"机上不循规旅客法律规制问题研究"(3122016R001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：擅开飞机舱门行为是一种典型的"机闹"行为。司法实践中,擅开飞机舱门行为一般作为普通的治安违法行为由公安机关处理结案。然而,在朴某擅开飞机舱门案中,由于案件本身的特殊性,实务部门对该案的法律适用意见不一。擅开飞机舱门行为法律适用的困境主要表现在两个方面:一是对擅开飞机舱门行为的法律规制存在缺漏;二是对擅开飞机舱门行为的认定,包括能否对该类行为定罪处罚、如何选择合适的罪名等问题,存在较大争议。为解决上述司法困境,需要明确擅开飞机舱门行为的法律性质,完善对擅开飞机舱门行为的处罚措施,更好地规范此类行为的法律适用。Opening airplane cabin door without authorization is a kind of typical disturbing behaviors on board. In judicial practice, this behavior is generally treated as ordinary security violation handled by the public security organ. In the case of Piao, however, practical departments have disagreements on the legal application because of its particularity. The judicial dilemma of opening the airplane cabin door without authorization is mainly manifested in two aspects： the first is the legal and regulatory gaps to this behavior; the second is the big controversy of legal identification of this behavior, including whether it should be convicted or punished, how to convict and so on. To solve this judicial dilemma, it would be necessary to define the legal nature of this behavior and improve the punitive measures, in order to better regulate the legal application of such behaviors.

关 键 词：“机闹”行为 擅开飞机舱门 司法困境 

分 类 号：D922.144[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]