检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张平寿[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第4期87-98,共12页Journal of People’s Public Security University of China:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:侦检协作虽有坚实的法理基础和重大实践价值,但理论推崇、实务响应的表象下其运行成效并不显著,适用范围狭窄、推行不畅、协作异化等往往成为常态。究其缘由,既有立法基础薄弱、制度保障不足的因素,亦与协作欠缺互动、激励机制匮乏有关。在当前我国宪法和法律关于侦检机关属性定位和职能配置的框架下,侦查环节目标导向的重塑、检察机关侦查指挥权的有限赋予以及评价体系对侦检协作内容的合理吸纳等,无疑可以成为侦检协作进一步推进的现实选择。Although the police and procuratorate cooperation has solid legal foundation and significant practical value, its effect is not outstanding below the surface of theoretical support and practical response. The phenomenon like narrow applicable scope, blocked implementation, and alienated collaboration are very common. The main factors are weak legal basis, insufficient institutional guarantee, insufficient collaboration and the lack of incentive mechanism. Under the current constitutional and legal framework about nature and functions of police and procuratorate, resetting investigation target, empowering procuratorate commanding power to investigation, and establishing evaluation collaboration system would be practical choices to promote the police and procuratorate cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112