检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘华[1,2] 刘月美[3] 关芮 徐昭[4] 朱文增[1]
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院广安门医院,北京100032 [2]北京中医药大学针灸推拿学院,北京100029 [3]北京师范大学生命科学学院,北京100875 [4]北京中医药大学东直门医院东区,北京101121
出 处:《中国实验动物学报》2016年第4期399-402,共4页Acta Laboratorium Animalis Scientia Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81273841)
摘 要:目的对颈总动脉穿刺法及传统线栓法制备大鼠大脑中动脉栓塞(middle cerebral artery occlusion,MCAO)模型的时效性、成功率、死亡率比较。方法将32只雄性大鼠随机分为颈总动脉穿刺法组与传统线栓法组,将线栓从颈总动脉插入,栓塞大脑中动脉。采用Bederson神经功能评分标准,于术后24 h进行神经功能评分,并统计24 h成功率及死亡率。结果颈总动脉穿刺法和传统手术方法制备大鼠MCAO模型的插线栓时间、成功率、死亡率分别为(82.3±17.4)s和(164.6±22.0)s,差异有显著性(P<0.01);87.5%和68.75%,差异无显著性(P>0.05);6.25%和18.75%,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论颈总动脉穿刺法制备大鼠大脑中动脉栓塞模型简单省时,创伤小,可操作性强。Objective To compare the timeliness,success and mortality rates between the modified carotid artery puncture method( MCAPM) and standard suture method( SSM) in the establishment of rat model of a middle cerebral artery occlusion( MCAO). Methods Thirty-two male rats were randomly and equally assigned into MCAPM group and SSM group. The MCAO models were established by inserting a thread into the common carotid artery( CCA). 24 h after modeling,the rats of the two groups were evaluated with Bederson neurological scores,and the modeling success rate and mortality rate were analyzed. Results The suture insertion times,success rates and mortality rates of the MCAPM vs.SSM groups were( 82. 3 ± 17. 4) s versus( 164. 6 ± 22. 0) s( P 〈 0. 01),87. 5% versus 68. 75%( P 〉 0. 05),and6. 25% versus 18. 75%( P 〉 0. 05). Conclusions MCAPM can be used to establish the rat model of MCAO due to its simplicity,mild wound and feasibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177