两种不同方法治疗新生儿肺炎的疗效观察  

Clinical effect observation of two methods in treatment of neonatal pneumonia

作　　者：陈新宙 

机构地区：[1]江西省宜春市人民医院新生儿科,江西宜春336000

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2016年第19期116-118,共3页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨α-细辛脑注射液雾化吸入辅助治疗新生儿肺炎的临床效果。方法选取2014年1月-2016年1月我院收治的68例新生儿肺炎患儿作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组34例,给予对照组患儿常规吸氧、抗感染、对症等相关治疗,给予观察组患儿在对照组治疗的基础上,使用α-细辛脑注射液＋生理盐水雾化吸入辅助治疗,患儿均治疗7 d,对比两组患儿的治疗效果。结果观察组患儿治疗总有效率91.2%比对照组的64.7%明显较高（P〈0.05）。观察组患儿咳嗽好转时间、咳痰好转时间、喘息好转时间、肺部音消失时间、住院时间与对照组相比明显较短,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。观察组患儿不良反应发生率与对照组患儿比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论给予新生儿肺炎患儿α-细辛脑注射液雾化吸入治疗,能有效提高治疗效果,改善临床症状,促进患儿早日出院,可在新生儿肺炎患儿中推广应用。Objective To explore clinical effect of α-asarone injection aerosol inhalation as adjuvant therapy for neonatal pneumonia.Methods 68 patients with neonatal pneumonia treated in our hospital from January 2014 to January2016 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,each group with 34 cases.Patients in the control group were given routine therapy including oxygen inhalation,anti-infection,and symptomatic treatment,while patients in the observation group were additionally given α-asarone injection＋normal saline aerosol inhalation as adjuvant therapy,course of treatment for 7 days.The effects in two groups were observed and compared.Results The total effective rate was 91.2% in the observation group,which was significantly higher than 64.7% in the control group（P〈0.05）.The remission time of cough,expectoration and asthma,extinction time of lung rale,hospital stays in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group respectively（P〈0.05）.There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between two groups（P〉0.05）.Conclusion Application of α-asarone injection aerosol inhalation can effectively improve the treatment effect on neonatal pneumonia,relieve clinical symptoms of patients,and facilitate early discharge of patients,which is worth to be promoted.

关 键 词：新生儿肺炎 Α-细辛脑注射液 雾化吸入 

分 类 号：R725.6[医药卫生—儿科]