检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西省宜春市人民医院神经外科,江西宜春336000
出 处:《中国现代医生》2016年第22期150-152,共3页China Modern Doctor
基 金:江西省宜春市科技局课题(JXYC2016KSA009)
摘 要:目的 探讨无刺激性气管切开处换药方法的护理应用效果。方法 将2015年1月~2016年4月来我院接受治疗的60例气管切开术患者纳入本研究。按照入院顺序抽签后随机分为实验组和对照组,对照组患者采取传统换药方法,实验组患者采取无刺激性气管切开处换药方法。观察比较两组患者换药效果。结果 实验组皮肤受损率(3.33%)低于对照组(53.33%)(P〈0.05),实验组皮肤受损发生时间短、术后切口处换药次数低于对照组(P〈0.05),实验组切口感染发生率(6.67%)低于对照组(33.33%)(P〈0.05),实验组舒适度(90.00%)高于对照组(3.33%)(P〈0.05)。结论 无刺激性气管切开处换药方法的护理应用效果较好,患者皮肤受损率低,皮肤受损发生时间、术后切口处换药次数低,切口感染发生率低,舒适度高,临床应用价值较高。Objective To explore the application effect on tracheotomy in dressing with nonirritant. Methods 60 cases of patients with traeheotomy were randomly divided into experiment group and control group, the control group was cared by traditional treatment methods, the experiment group was cared by traeheotomy in dressing with nonirritant. The treatment effects were observed. Results The skin damage rate for the experiment group (3.33%) were lower than the control group (53.33%)(P〈0.05); The skin damage was shorter, postoperative incision dressing for the experiment group were lower than the control group (P〈0.05); The rate of incision infection for the experiment group (6.67%) were lower than the control group(33.33%)(P〈0.05); The rate of comfort degree for the experiment group(90.00%) were higher than the control group(3.33%)(P〈0.05). Conclusion It has good clinical effects on tracheotomy in dressing with nonirritant, it has low rate of skin damage, skin damage occurred, postoperative incision dressing, incision infection, it has high com- fort degree rate, it has high values of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70