检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:莫艳清[1]
出 处:《浙江树人大学学报》2016年第3期44-50,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Shuren University
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(15NDJC213YB);国家社科基金重点课题(12ASH003)
摘 要:在国家反向输入资源的后税费时代,乡村场域内治理主体的角色与行为逻辑发生重大变化,这一系列变化产生极为复杂的村庄政治现象。通过对后税费时代乡村场域内治理主体状况及行为逻辑的考察,运用基于科尔曼理性选择理论的"目标—行动"框架解析当下"富人治村"现象生成的内在逻辑:它是基层政府、富人及普通农民三方基于各自利益而无意识合谋的结果。集体无意识合谋而成的"富人治村"将基层社会治理带入困境。In the post tax era, the role and behavior logic of the main bodies of governance in rural areas have significantly changed, which have created very complicated village political phenomenon. Through investigating the rural governance subject status and behavior logic in the post tax era, this paper analyzes the internal logic of the formation of the governance of village by the rich using the "purpose - action" framework based on Coleman's rational choice theory, it is the result of unintentional col- lusion by rural government, the rich and the ordinary farmers based on their own interests. Collective unintentional collusion of the governance of village by the rich can bring the rural governance into trouble.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.244.233