机构地区:[1]郑州大学人民医院河南省人民医院肝胆胰腺外科,郑州450003
出 处:《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》2016年第9期878-880,共3页Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基 金:河南省科技攻关项目(142300410273)
摘 要:目的探讨经腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆管探查取石术治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎的临床疗效。方法急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎患者113例,其中开腹行胆管探查取石术82例为开腹组,经腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆管探查取石术31例为腹腔镜组。记录2组手术时间、住院时间,观察有无胆漏、切口感染、结石残留、肝功能失代偿等,并进行2组间比较;根据手术前、后血常规及肝功能指标的变化,评估手术治疗效果。结果2组手术均顺利,腹腔镜组无中转开腹病例,手术时间[(2.2±0.2)h]以及术后胆漏发生率(6.4%)、残石发生率(29.0%)与开腹组[(1.9±0.1)h,9.8%,25.6%]比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.005),腹腔镜组住院时间[(5.8±0.5)d3、术后切口感染发生率(0)低于开腹组[(10.1±0.3)d,13.4%](P〈0.05);术后第5天,开腹组与腹腔镜组谷丙转氨酶[(33.2±1.7)、(27.6±2.7)u/L]、谷草转氨酶[(28.9±3.6)、(34.3±10.1)u/L]、总胆红素[(17.9±0.7)、(18.8±1.2)μmol/L]以及白细胞计数[(7.4±0.2)×10^9、(7.2±0.3)×10^9/L]均较术前[(92.2±5.1)、(87.7±9.6)u/L,(78.2±4.2)、(91.2±9.6)u/L,(76.4±2.5)、(79.7±4.5)μmol/L,(15.4±2.9)×10^9/L、(16.3±3.1)×10^9/L]明显降低(P〈0.05),血小板计数[(143.0±6.6)×10^9/L、(120.5±9.8)×10^9/L]较术前[(104.3±7.8)×10^9/L、(89,2±11.0)×10^9/L]增高(P〈0.05),但术后以上指标组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论经腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆管探查取石术治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎效果与开腹手术相同,可缩短住院时间,降低术后切口感染发生率。Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in common bile duct exploration on acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis. Methods A total of 113 cases of acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis were divided into open surgery group receiving open common bile duct exploration and removing the stone (n=82) and laparoscopy group receiving laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy (n= 31). The operation lasting time and hospitalization stay were recorded, and the incidences of bile leakage, incision infection, residual calculi and hepatic decompensation were observed and compared between two groups. The operation outcome was evaluated according to the changes of blood test results and liver function indexes before and after operation. Results Both two groups fulfilled operation smoothly with no conversion to laparotomy. There were no significant differences in the operation lasting time ((2. 2 ±0. 2) h vs (1. 9 ± 0. 1) h), and the incidences of postoperative bile leakage (6.4% vs 9.8%) and residual calculi (29.0% vs 25. 6%) between laparoscopy group and open surgery group (P〉0.05). The hospitalization stay ((5.8±0.5) d) was significantly shorter and incision infection rate (0) was significantly lower in laparoscopy group than those in open surgery group ((10. 1± 0. 3) d, 13. 4%) (P〈0.05). The levels of glutamate pyruvate transaminase ((33.2±1.7), (27.6±2.7) u/L), glutamic-oxal(o)acetic transaminase ((28.9±3.6), (34.3± 10.1) u/L), totalbilirubin ((17.9±_0.7), (18.8±1.2) μmol/L) and white blood cell count ((7.4±0.2)×10^9/L, (7.2± 0.3)10^9/L) in open surgery group and laparoscopy group by day 5 after operation were significantly lower than those before operation ((92.2±5.1), (87.7±9.6) u/L; (78.2±4.2), (91.2±9.6) u/L; (76.4.±2.5), (79.7±4.5) μmol/L; (15.4±2.9)× 10^9/L, (16.3±3.1) × 10^9/L) (P〈0.05
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...