检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨鹍飞[1,2]
机构地区:[1]四川大学中国西部边疆安全与发展协同创新中心,成都610065 [2]四川大学公共管理学院,成都610065
出 处:《广西民族研究》2016年第4期26-34,共9页GUANGXI ETHNIC STUDIES
基 金:国家民委后期资助项目“边疆民族群体性事件:发生、演化与干预”(2015-GM-217)
摘 要:民族群体性事件是群体性事件的一种特殊类型,精英则是群体性事件组织化的关键。本研究运用SPSS软件进行Logistic回归和相关性分析定量研究方法,对不同类型民族精英的动员能力与其社会资本的关系进行量化分析。研究发现,社会精英与宗教精英的动员能力没有显著差异;民族精英的社会资本越大,其动员能力越强;动员者与被动员者之间的关系强度越强,被动员参与民族群体性事件的可能性越高。基于研究发现,我们认为,政府应建立制度化的机制,扩大政治参与渠道,吸纳社会精英合法参与政治进程,从动员逻辑上消除民族群体性事件被"三股势力"所利用并演化为恶性群体犯罪的可能性。The massiveethnic incident is a special type of massiveincidentthat the elites are the keysof the organization. By using logistic regression and correlation quantitative analysis performed by SPSS softwareto analyze the relationship between the mobilization capability of different types of ethnic elites and their social capital, this study finds out that there is no significant difference of mobilization-a- bility between social elites and religious elites; the greater social capital the ethnic elitespossess, the strongermobilization-ability they have; the closer the relationship between mobilization persons and partici- pants is,the higher possibility the participants involve in the massive ethnic incident. Based on these find- ings, we recommend the government to establish relevant institutional mechanisms to extend channelsof politicalparticipation and to absorb social elitesinto the legal political process, which will eliminate the possibility of massive ethnic incidenttaken advantage by " the three evil forces" to become vicious col- lective crime in the organizational logic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.97.137