以护理人员为主体的护理随访研究的中英文文献研究  

Study of the Chinese and English Literatures of Nurses-led Follow-up Research

作　　者：丁兰[1] 师俊华[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津医科大学总医院肾内科,天津300052

出　　处：《解放军护理杂志》2016年第14期32-34,共3页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army

摘　　要：目的了解以护理人员为主体的护理随访研究的中英文文献发表情况,探讨我国研究的发展特点。方法 2015年1月,以"护理"、"护士"、"随访"和"访视"为中文关键词,检索CNKI中国期刊全文数据库、维普全文电子期刊数据库和万方电子期刊数据库;以"follow-up"、"nurse"及"nursing"为英文关键词,检索Medline上的英文文献;文献的发表时间为1995-2013年。通过阅读文章题目和摘要确定是否符合要求,满足初步要求后下载获得全文,并对两者的研究领域、研究方法、内容进行比较分析。结果共纳入英文文献47篇、中文文献44篇。中文文献与英文文献研究领域的分布特点差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。中英文文献在随访时间、随访方式上的差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),且中英文文献中实验性研究所占比例的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论我国以护理人员为主导的随访研究开展已有一定规模,但方法须进一步完善。Objective To understand the Chinese and English literatures publication of nurse-led follow-up research,and to discuss the development characteristic of researches in China.Methods By using ‘nursing’,‘nurse’,‘follow-up’and‘interview’as key Chinese words to search the CNKI,VIP and Wanfang databases,and using ‘follow-up’,‘nurses’and‘nursing’as key English words to search Medline database.The publication time was limited to 1995-2013.The qualified papers were identified based on titles and abstract,and download the full paper.The research field,research method and content of two groups were compared.Results Totally 47 English papers and 44 Chinese papers were included.The research field was different in Chinese and English papers （all P〈0.05）.The statistical significances of follow-up time,and follow-up method were found between Chinese and English papers （all P〈0.05）,and the statistical significance of experimental study in English and Chinese liter-atures was found （P〈0.01）.Conclusions Nurse-led follow-up research in China have a certain scale,but the research methods need further improvement.

关 键 词：随访 文献 护理 

分 类 号：R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]